complete background check

Boston Area P.I. Trio Weigh in on Hernandez Murder Case – “Kraft Put the Blinders On”

Bookmark and Share

Article Courtesy of THE BOSTON GLOBE - "Click Here"

Private detectives see holes in Patriots’ path

Investigators say they could have discovered clues about behavior of Hernandez

Article Courtesy of:  Shira Springer | GLOBE STAFF 
Private Investigators Boston - Skip Tracing Detectives

Photo Via PAT GREENHOUSE/GLOBE STAFF – Boston Private Investigators

Private investigators such as John Nardizzi, Pamela Hay, and Jay Groob (left to right) have weighed in on how they might have kept an eye on Aaron Hernandez before his arrest.

Last month, with new details about the Aaron Hernandez murder case surfacing almost daily, private detective Jay Groob sent Patriots owner Robert Kraft a sales letter. Groob pitched “investigative and security services,” including “vetting, due diligence, and surveillance of personnel.”

As president of American Investigative Services and a licensed private detective in Massachusetts for 30 years, Groob welcomed “the opportunity to consult with the Patriots and determine whether there is a particular need we can fulfill.”

Following Kraft’s first public comments about the Hernandez case, the offer appeared well-targeted (though to date Kraft has not responded to Groob).

After authorities arrested Hernandez, 23, on first-degree murder charges, Kraft said he had been “duped” by the tight end. Speaking from his office at Gillette Stadium, Kraft said he only knew “what goes on inside this building” and that “we don’t put private eyes on people.”

Groob and other local private investigators found those statements curious, especially in reference to a player such as Hernandez, who had arrived in Foxborough with questions about his past.

“To say Kraft only knows what’s going on in the building, it’s like having blinders and earmuffs on,” said private investigator Bob Long. “Is that all he wants to know?”

Robert Kraft / Aaron Hernandez Image Via Fox Sports

Long, a former Massachusetts State Police detective and the first witness called in the James “Whitey” Bulger trial, built a career on the close examination of criminals. Now, he applies his law-enforcement experience to character due diligence and background checks. He counts professional sports franchises among his clients, investigating potential team executives but not athletes.

“Due diligence is not anything new in sports,” said Long, president of Bob Long Investigations Group, LLC. “It’s conducted on athletes because you’re investing millions and millions of dollars in them.

“A lot of teams are willing to take some risk. They keep their fingers crossed that nothing happens and have blinders on and earmuffs on and hope nothing blows up. Well, in this case, it did.”

When asked if they go beyond the basic background screening done by NFL security on draft-eligible players and, if so, what extra investigative measures are taken, the Patriots issued the following statement:

“The Patriots conduct extensive background checks, beyond those provided by the NFL, on every player we draft and acquire. We constantly seek ways to improve the player evaluation process and will continue to invest in ways that allow us to be as diligent as possible in every aspect of the overall evaluations.”

The Patriots would not say whether they would consider hiring private detectives in the future.

Change in procedures?

Skip Tracing - Boston Private Investigators

Image Via Ted Fitzgerald / Boston Herald pool via AP file. Former New England Patriots football tight end Aaron Hernandez  during a bail hearing in Fall River Superior Court on June 27, in Fall River, Mass.

No one could have predicted there would be murder charges against Hernandez, but private detectives might have changed the risk/reward equation as the Patriots first considered drafting him and then weighed offering him a five-year contract extension worth nearly $40 million in August 2012.

In the weeks since Hernandez’s arrest June 26 for the murder of Odin Lloyd, police have investigated his connection to a 2012 double homicide and uncovered a “flop house” he used in Franklin where they found boxes of ammunition. Other reports have highlighted Hernandez’s combative nature inside and outside of Gillette Stadium.

“To be honest with you, I would have him followed,” said private investigator Phil Sharkey, president of The Hire Authority, a company that specializes in pre-employment background screening. “This other apartment probably would have surfaced from following this guy around. It would have been a huge red flag.

“It sounds unfathomable that something wasn’t done before they re-signed him.”

Groob added that he, too, would have done surveillance on Hernandez.

“It’s the only way you’re going to get the wherewithal to make an informed decision on this person,” said Groob.

Background investigations are another tool private detectives use for their corporate clients. Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, investigators have seen a dramatic increase in business-sector demand for thorough background checks. More recently, they’ve found that interest typically spikes when there is an incidence of workplace violence.

In the wake of the Hernandez murder charge, some private investigators predict that sports teams will reexamine how they conduct background checks on players.

“I think there will be changes, and it won’t just happen in the NFL,” said Alan Sklar, president and CEO of Creative Services Inc., a global employment screening firm that counts the Celtics as clients for non-player background checks.

“You’re going to have the NBA, Major League Baseball, hockey, everyone sit down. If they haven’t done it yet, I’m sure they’re in the process of saying, ‘We don’t want this to happen to us. What’s the lesson learned here?’

“If there is a risk factor, then they probably will be a little more aggressive in trying to obtain information.”

Checking for patterns

Video:  Weighing A Superstar’s Character

The insular sports world can work against thorough, objective player-background checks.

According to private detectives, coaches, general managers, and team security may see only what they want when it comes to athletes they know well and who perform well. And some investigators suggest that background checks should involve interviews with people who know the athletes in question but are not invested in their future success.

“Over the years, I have discussed doing background due diligence for certain sports teams,” said private investigator and attorney John Nardizzi, whose company, Nardizzi & Associates Inc., has conducted roughly a dozen athlete-background checks for professional teams. “The response from some who say they recognize the value of such research, but decline to do it, is that they believe their contacts on the ground — former coaches, ex-players who are with the college or team and ‘knew the guy real well’ — are in a superior position when assessing character.”

But appearances can be deceptive. When Hernandez greeted Kraft, it was often with a kiss on the cheek. Also, before he was drafted, Hernandez wrote a letter to Patriots player personnel director Nick Caserio addressing allegations of past drug use and offering to forfeit salary or reimburse the team if he failed any drug tests. And after he got his extension, Hernandez donated $50,000 to the Myra Kraft Giving Back Fund, a charity established in honor of the owner’s late wife.

To a private detective, these are not the important details.

With a name and a Social Security number, private detectives can locate records of any criminal or civil cases, driving records, financial histories, and past residences, among other pieces of intelligence. These days, it’s also easy to scan social media for clues to a person’s character. From there, investigators can see red flags, whether it’s an obvious problem such as run-ins with law enforcement or more subtle issues such as living beyond your means.

Private detectives look for patterns of behavior that can reveal character and perhaps predict future conduct.

Whether or not red flags emerge, some employers might be satisfied with database searches. But if there are problematic patterns, the followup work could involve interviewing witnesses in dismissed criminal cases, talking to former teachers, or visiting bars that the prospective employee frequents. Groob sometimes uses handwriting analysis as a screening tool because it’s something he believes people cannot manipulate.

Investigations can range from a few hundred dollars for a basic database search to $30,000 or more for surveillance by a team of private detectives.

They can take a few days at a computer screen to a few weeks or more with neighborhood canvasses, witness interviews, and surveillance.

For an investigation that includes interviews and surveillance on someone who arrives with a questionable past or raises red flags during detective work, Sklar said the process could stretch into months and approach $100,000.

For the Complete Boston Globe Article… CLICK HERE  Great Read!

Article Courtesy of THE BOSTON GLOBE - "Click Here"

Article Courtesy of:  The Boston Globe

Comments

  1. Character? I would think that, by far, the best way to investigate a person’s character is trying to interview those that know him – both past and present. A database, or credit report, shows only a minimal amount of information on character. Go to the source – people that have had contact with him in school, the workplace, and the neighborhood.

Speak Your Mind

15 − ten =

IP Blocking Protection is enabled by IP Address Blocker from LionScripts.com.